Which leadership style is least likely to provide clear directions to employees?

Laissez-faire leadership is characterized by a hands-off approach, where leaders provide minimal guidance and allow employees significant autonomy in how they perform their tasks. This style can often lead to ambiguity around expectations and directions, as the leader steps back from actively managing or providing clear instructions. Employees may feel lost or unsupported, particularly if they require more structure to thrive. In environments where tasks are complex or where cohesion and direction are essential, this style can be counterproductive.

In contrast, authoritarian leadership typically involves a top-down approach with clear directives and expectations set by the leader. Transformational leadership inspires and motivates employees while providing a clear vision and support for their development. Servant leadership focuses on empowering and serving employees, but still offers direction and support to help them reach their goals. Thus, while the other leadership styles provide frameworks for guiding employees, laissez-faire leadership lacks the necessary clarity in direction, making it the least likely to provide clear instructions.